Up to PostgreSQL 9.6, hash indexes were second class. Using them in production was not recommended; they weren't crash-safe. That's going to change with PostgreSQL 10. And here's what's gonna change.
Tuesday, June 27, 2017
PostgreSQL: production-ready Hash Indexes
Up to PostgreSQL 9.6, hash indexes were second class. Using them in production was not recommended; they weren't crash-safe. That's going to change with PostgreSQL 10. And here's what's gonna change.
Saturday, June 10, 2017
CI Done Right
![]() |
| Broken. |
Recently, some people have had some serious issues with a broken setuptools release [1, 2, 3]. One special complain was about broken CI systems just because of this central package. Replying to those reactions, I had a conversation via twitter about certain design decisions of continuous integration [4, 5].
In this post, I want to assemble part of my personal experience in building those systems for the last couple of years. The result should be a little cozy guideline for those setting up their CI system and CD system within a corporate environment.
Wednesday, May 3, 2017
PostgreSQL 10 is on its way
![]() |
| A multitude of features and fascinating details. |
The next major release of PostgreSQL is on its way. It's a huge release in terms of features, improvements and bugfixes.
First things first
Versioning has been changed to a simpler scheme using only two numbers: major and minor version. So, this will be PostgreSQL 10 followed by 10.1 and 10.2 and so on. Okay, now let's get to the real deal 😉Thursday, September 29, 2016
PostgreSQL 9.6 Released
We are finally there. There is a new major version of PostgreSQL - 9.6.
Here are the news, so go ahead and read what they've done for the community. It's just great!
Cheers!
Here are the news, so go ahead and read what they've done for the community. It's just great!
Cheers!
Wednesday, September 7, 2016
PostgreSQL: Optimizing Aggregates
![]() |
| Aggregation of vast energy: our sun. |
Tuesday, September 6, 2016
Followup: systemd user instances
In this last post, I wrote about how to fix systemd user instances for older/broken systemd versions. Here, I'd like to explain how we managed to get the solution for, say, more than a single host where you can't do those changes by hand (at least not while keeping you sane and your customers happy).
In order to keep track here, we need to do the following:
In order to keep track here, we need to do the following:
Tuesday, August 23, 2016
What do you do when you need more systemd instances?
![]() |
| You wanna make it there? You need to go there! |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




